Spur-throated grasshopper
New bee photographs
Here are a few new photos from the last week or two — got a handful of interesting bees.
Oriental beetle
Bee-like robber fly

I couldn’t find my macro diffuser when I went out to shoot this morning, and since I was trying to get out the door before some rain moved in, I just configured my bracket so the bare flash head was as close to the focal point as possible. This put it a few inches in front of the lens, so it probably had an apparent size about half again as large as in the position I normally use it. I was actually pretty impressed with the results. It could be that it’s just close enough to work well when it’s configured like this, though I was also shooting bugs in flowers for the most part, which might well have been acting as little miniature reflectors. We’ll see; it was definitely convenient to shoot this way, with no diffuser to keep from slipping after every shot.
This is one of the images I got, of a bee-like robber fly (Laphria, maybe thoracica?) who kept turning to watch me intently as I was shooting. It’s a perfect example of a bee-mimic, like so many flies: I thought I was shooting a bumblebee until I got a closer look at the head. The mimicry is defensive for many of them, especially the ones that look like yellowjackets. The robber flies are predators though, and I’d bet that their appearance lets them get close enough to their prey to catch and kill them. Notice the tubular mouth, underneath the moustache-like bristles? They stab with that. And though it’s not apparent in this image, their legs are covered with spines that keep their prey from escaping. Some of the larger robber flies can have a painful bite, and have been known to eat hummingbirds. Fun little flies.
Toxomerus marginatus

Other Bees
A male carpenter bee (Xylocopa virginica) is dusted with pollen as he probes a flower for nectar. Unlike the females, he’s not collecting any pollen for food, but the dusting you see across the head and legs will pollinate other flowers he visits. You can tell it’s a male by the large eyes and the yellow color to the face.
You see these guys guarding their own little plot of air space from other bees, and they’ll commonly come buzzing over to check you out if you come too close, but they’re totally harmless as long as you’re not another carpenter bee. It can be intimidating if you don’t know this, of course, because these are big, heavy bees around an inch long.
First bug photo of 2011
New Photos, 9/3/10
The photos I’ve added to my gallery this week are from a trip to visit family in upstate New York. My parents get a lot of bees and butterflies in their yard, so it’s usually a good opportunity to get something interesting while I’m there.


jupiter and moons

jupiter and moons
Jupiter is rising early these days, the brightest object in the night sky besides the moon. I mounted my 70-200mm on a tripod, and though it’s not what I’d call a functional astrophotography setup, I love that I was able to get a clean shot of several of Jupiter’s moons.
This image is very heavily cropped. 200mm did not get me very close to Jupiter. Even still, this little white blob is about 300 times the mass of Earth.
It reminds me a bit of an opportunity I had in college to visit a radio telescope observatory. They had some optical telescopes, much more powerful than anything I’d ever played with at home, and Saturn was visible the night we were there. It’s honestly one of the most amazing things you could hope to see: this unimaginably giant planet, with pale desaturated brown and tan bands and huge wide rings, with bright little moons hanging next to it, the whole thing tiny but crystal clear in the eyepiece.
I wish I lived in a place where light pollution didn’t drown out everything dimmer than a low-flying airplane. The actual beauty of these planets seen in person — naked eye or telescope — is completely unlike anything else. The sense of distance, uncrossable distance, is profound and I think quite necessary.
New Photos
Sorry for the lack of posts lately — been a hectic couple of weeks. Lots of work, lots of back and forth, and very little time to sit down to get through photos. But here’s a few that I added to my gallery this week.
Long-horned bee
A male long-horned bee, possibly in the genus Melissodes, drinks nectar from a sunflower. The long-horned bees, or Eucerini, are a large tribe of solitary bees that dig nests; like most solitary bees the actual nesting habits varies from species to species, but none of them build the huge nests we associate with honey bees. And none of them have the same complex social structure with queens, workers, and drones. The Eucerini get their name from the extremely long antennae of the males: the word itself means “true horn”.
I see large crowds of these bees on sunflowers near me, especially in mid to late summer. The males hang out and drink nectar, and wait for a chance to mate with females who stop by for a break in their constant pollen-gathering. They start early and work at it all day: I walked past some at about 8:30am this morning and there were several females with heavily-loaded pollen baskets. A few miner bees and tiny sweat bees as well.
I took this shot yesterday afternoon. It’s at a 1:1 magnification ratio, so just the macro lens without any tubes. The flash, a Canon 430EX II, is mounted on a bracket I put together, and shot through a diffuser made out of an old yogurt cup and Rosco diffusion paper. Unfortunately, right after I finished with these bees and started walking to the next place I hoped to find bees, the off-camera cord I had the flash mounted on literally ripped off of its threaded mounting post, and bungeed down onto the street. No damage, I think, since the coil-cord slowed its fall, but it’s making me seriously rethink the value of using the cord’s hotshoe as a mount: obviously there’s too much flex and stress with the flash’s center of gravity so much higher than where it’s secured.
The identification of this bee proves difficult. I got several clear shots of the wing venation, an important characteristic to select between the hundreds of species of bees in New England, and one or two showing the color and texture of the thorax very nicely. With this, I used the bee genera guide at discoverlife.org to narrow it down to a few species in several genera that don’t really look like perfect fits — different proportions and eye color, for example — or one eleven species in the genus Melissodes, which I think this probably is. The guides at discoverlife.org are highly detailed keys that need more knowledge than I actually have, not to mentioned a mounted specimen and a microscope, to take full advantage of, but it’s still extremely useful in drilling down with the right shots. Once I repair my rig, I plan to go back to these flowers at night to shoot them sleeping — the males really don’t seem to leave — and hopefully get a few other details that will help confirm the ID.
Lucanus capreolus
Reddish-brown stag beetle
Lucanus capreolus
Here’s a big little beast. This reddish-brown stag beetle is about an inch long, with a thick, deep red body and huge mandibles. They look like an over-grown, over-armored army ant, but in fact the jaws are not terribly powerful. (From what I hear — I haven’t been pinched by one personally.) The beetle doesn’t need them to be: the adults feed on tree sap, and the females have little nubbins instead. Well, really the females have normally-proportioned mandibles for a beetle of their quite large size, but in comparison to the males’, they look a bit dwarfish.
Given that these oversized mandibles are useless for foraging and impractical for defense, and that it’s the males who lug them around, you can immediately guess what they’re for: wrestling. They fight over breeding territory, and the biggest mandibles gets the ladies. After mating, the female lays her eggs in rotten wood, which feeds the larvae as they grow over the next few years.
I found this particular guy upside-down on the sidewalk, fairly early in the morning. They’re crepuscular animals, meaning they come out at dawn and dusk, so he was probably wrapping up his morning activity. No idea how he got flipped over, but they’re not very graceful fliers, and he may have just tired himself out. They seem to play dead when on their back, like many insects, but I wonder if that’s a defensive response or if they just take a moment to gather their strength. At any rate, I brought him home and stuck him in a clean plastic cup, with some paper towels for cover, and gave him a few drops of sugar water later on.
To shoot him, I turned a small cardboard shipping box into a lightbox, by cutting away a few extra sides and flaps, taping white printer paper along the inside, and covering the top with Rosco 1/4 Tough diffusion paper. I put the 430EX II on a light stand directly overhead, and used the WhiBal to nail the color temperature down and get the exposure in the right ballpark. I took a few shots at 1:1 with the 100mm Macro, and made a series of four verticals to merge into a hi-res horizontal, but he moved around a bit as I was shooting and they don’t have a consistent focal point. This is one of them.
Identification was simple. Any huge beetle with huge mandibles is probably one of the stag beetles (Lucanidae), and we only have a few in New England. Lucanus capreolus is dark red, with a lighter yellow thigh. I was pretty confidant after flipping through Marshall’s guide, and then checked the key on bugguide.net to confirm it. There’s another species, L. elaphus, with even larger mandibles, but the ones on this guy are only about as long as the pronotum (the head). It’s not visible in this image, but he has fan-shaped clubs at the end of the antennae, the eyes are slightly divided by a little protrusion called a canthus, and the surface of the pronotum and the elytra (the wing covers) are pretty smooth. All these things say Lucanus, and rule out other related stag beetles.
Scytodes thoracica
Spitting Spider
Scytodes thoracica
This handsome little spider is, literally, a spitting spider. Their silk glands are located next to the venom glands in their head (well, the cephalothorax), instead of the abdomen, like many more common spiders. They don’t spin webs at all, preferring to stalk their prey at night. Once they’ve gotten close enough, about a centimeter or so, they spray a line of venomous liquid silk from their fangs, snaring the prey. And then they eat it.
This is the first spitting spider I’ve ever seen. I pulled out a bowl for some cereal, and lo and behold, there was a spider with these really neat markings in it. Nature is everywhere, even the cupboard. It’s a very small spider: this photo was taken at 2:1. I used the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM lens on extension tubes, lit with a 430EX II. The flash was shot through a 43″ umbrella mounted on a lightstand; ordinarily I would say that’s an impractical setup for macro, but the spider wasn’t going anywhere and I had the whole thing set up in the living room already, except for the lens. Post-shoot wrap-up consisted of tossing the spider outside and getting a new bowl for the cereal.
It was a pretty straightforward animal to ID. The distinctive markings would have made it easy if I had known about this species, but I didn’t and so purposefully ignored them: the spider was small enough to be a juvenile of one of the more common kinds I see around the house, and color patterns are really variable in many spiders. Judging by the large cephalothorax (the front section, with the legs), I didn’t expect it to be a weaver. The eyes jumped out at me though, definitely not a jumping spider. There are six: a pair of median eyes in the center, and a pair of lateral eyes high on each side of the median eyes, partially hidden in the dark bands. So I turned to BugGuide’s guide to spider eye arrangements, got momentarily concerned because of the resemblance to the recluse spiders, and then found the species immediately when I checked the Scytodidae. There’s only one genus and a few species, and as it turns out, the markings for S. thoracica actually do look pretty useful for identification.
Spring flowers
The appearance of small plants and flowers in the past two weeks has been a huge relief. I’m not much of an indoor photographer, and with the change of weather I’ve finally been able to get outside again. I’ve gotten a few good ant shots already, but with my macro rig in a transitional state (to put it nicely) I’ve been changing things up by shooting some flowers in natural light. I uploaded several to my gallery this morning.
Prints of all these images are available through the links.
Portfolio
http://www.smugmug.com/ria/ShizamSlides-2009120303.swf?AlbumID=11065984&dontpost=true&AlbumKey=s7tq6&newWindow=false&width=400&height=400&transparent=true&splash=&showLogo=false&captions=true&clickUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smugmug.com&showThumbs=true&showButtons=true&pageStyle=white&autoStart=true&showSpeed=true&VersionNos=2009120303&splashDelay=0&crossFadeSpeed=350&clickToImage=true&showStartButton=false&randomStart=false&randomize=true&mainHost=www.michaelhampson.com
Smugmug added a new feature this week that it’s calling Smart Galleries, essentially a way to place virtual copies of an image into more than one gallery. It’s something like Flickr’s sets and galleries in one.
Anyway, I’ve made a “best of” gallery as a portfolio for my nature photography, so when I point someone to my website, I can give them a single link that shows off what I’m most proud of.
Check it out here!
2:1 magnification
I picked up a set of super inexpensive Pro Optic Extension Tubes. They feel pretty cheap and I doubt they’ll last for years and years, but they come with electrical connections at half the price of the Opteka
, a third the price of the Kenko
, and a hell of a lot cheaper than Canon’s. If I could afford the Kenko tubes, I’d probably have gone with them, since they’ll last a lot longer, but as long as they keep the lens on the camera and pass through information to stop down the aperture, extension tubes don’t need to be fancy. There’s no glass in them: they work by moving the lens farther from the sensor, so it projects a larger image. It’s a lot like a film or slide projector, where the farther it is from the wall, the larger the picture. But dimmer too: you have a fixed amount of light making up the image, and the larger that image, the ‘thinner’ it’s going to be.
We’re covered in snow and slush here in Boston, so my macro expeditions have been limited to the far corners of the kitchen, where I found the exotic Chlorophytum comosum: the spider plant. With the 100mm f/2.8 USM macro lens, the full set of tubes gives about 2:1 magnification. At this point, you really need buckets of light in order to get an aperture with a reasonable depth of field: my flash was set to 1/4 power and was only a few inches away. Unlike bugs, spider plants don’t run away from the camera, so I used a tripod to make these a bit easier.
Cambridge, Charles River (also: free photomerge software)
Cambridge, Charles River
Originally uploaded by mehampson
This image was made from seven photos taken on a bridge over the Charles River, in Harvard Square. The night before had seen strong, warm rains, and a cooler front was moving in, causing high, thin clouds and choppy water.
I made two copies of this, in Photoshop CS4 and in the open-source Hugin. Both of them struggled a bit, since I was using the wide end of the 28-105mm f/3.5-f/4.5 USM II zoom lens — there’s a bit of distortion in each shot that they had to account for, but both did a pretty good job in the end. Flipping between the two merged panoramas, I don’t see a great difference between them. This image is from CS4, because it happened to be in exact 3×5 proportions and didn’t need any further cropping; otherwise it would have been a coin toss which to upload.
And I also made a copy in Canon’s Photostitch. The interface was so simplistic and the results were so bad (it laid out each of the seven photos next to each other in a fan shape and blended the edges, with no overlapping or exposure blending at all) that I couldn’t see ever using it for any serious work. Useless. I uninstalled it.
I’m only using CS4 as trial; it’s a bit easier to use for panos than Hugin is, but Hugin isn’t hard. I know how silly it is to not post the Hugin image alongside for comparisons, but the images are big, and frankly look basically the same; at any rate, Hugin is open-source and free, so I’d say just download it and give it a try.
Floating foliage, reflections
Floating foliage, reflections
Originally uploaded by mehampson
Shot at a pretty high ISO, since I was using a circular polarizer and the light was fading. Digikam really does a great job of luminance noise reduction; with my noisier shots I’m exporting from there, with RAW noise reduction set to about 80-100, and then doing a selective Gaussian blur and unsharp mask in GiMP, both at a threshold of about 15-30, depending on the shot. The selective blur cleans up the last bits of noise in defocused areas, and the sharpness just tightens things up a bit.


































