<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Michael Hampson Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.michaelhampson.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com</link>
	<description>Nature, Science, and Macro Imagery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrating WordPress.org and Smugmug by Roy Abramson</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2011/01/integrating-wordpress-org-and-smugmug/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Abramson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 05:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelhampson.com/?p=341#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for your reply!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for your reply!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrating WordPress.org and Smugmug by Michael Hampson</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2011/01/integrating-wordpress-org-and-smugmug/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelhampson.com/?p=341#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Hi Roy -- sorry not to get back to you right away, I&#039;m in the process of moving.

I haven&#039;t heard of Photography Blogsites before so I don&#039;t know much beyond what&#039;s in their FAQ. It does look like they&#039;re doing the grunt-work integration, which is probably worth the money if you&#039;re not comfortable doing it yourself.

It&#039;s not clear to me how customizable their sites are: I would bet they have an interface to tweak the colors, fonts, etc. but I get the sense that you don&#039;t have the same degree of control that you would over a self-hosted WordPress installation. However, they do include maintenance, support, and updates (including security updates), and that&#039;s big. 

It would be interesting to know if they&#039;ve worked a hosting deal with Smugmug so your content isn&#039;t coming from two totally different servers. That&#039;s one big drawback of DIY&#039;ing it.

I think what I would say generally is that if you&#039;re relying on your site enough that any downtime would hurt clients or fans, and you&#039;re not already pretty CSS and WordPress savvy, it&#039;s probably worth paying for the service rather than learning as you go -- there&#039;s a lot that can go wrong. However, if you&#039;re a hacker at heart who can take some time to really get a handle on the technologies underneath it and don&#039;t mind being your own technical support, you would have a more flexible site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roy &#8212; sorry not to get back to you right away, I&#8217;m in the process of moving.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t heard of Photography Blogsites before so I don&#8217;t know much beyond what&#8217;s in their FAQ. It does look like they&#8217;re doing the grunt-work integration, which is probably worth the money if you&#8217;re not comfortable doing it yourself.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not clear to me how customizable their sites are: I would bet they have an interface to tweak the colors, fonts, etc. but I get the sense that you don&#8217;t have the same degree of control that you would over a self-hosted WordPress installation. However, they do include maintenance, support, and updates (including security updates), and that&#8217;s big. </p>
<p>It would be interesting to know if they&#8217;ve worked a hosting deal with Smugmug so your content isn&#8217;t coming from two totally different servers. That&#8217;s one big drawback of DIY&#8217;ing it.</p>
<p>I think what I would say generally is that if you&#8217;re relying on your site enough that any downtime would hurt clients or fans, and you&#8217;re not already pretty CSS and WordPress savvy, it&#8217;s probably worth paying for the service rather than learning as you go &#8212; there&#8217;s a lot that can go wrong. However, if you&#8217;re a hacker at heart who can take some time to really get a handle on the technologies underneath it and don&#8217;t mind being your own technical support, you would have a more flexible site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrating WordPress.org and Smugmug by Roy Abramson</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2011/01/integrating-wordpress-org-and-smugmug/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Abramson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelhampson.com/?p=341#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Hello there!
There is a service called &quot;photography blogsites&quot;-  have you heard of it? since I don&#039;t know much about CSS HTML etc, I also have a Smugmug pro acount and have the same desire-to find a way to make everything homogeous - it isn&#039;t cheap but it battles all that you have discussed. I don&#039;t know much about wordpress but I am not so happy with the blogsites themes-Do you have a word of advice for me? Thank you Very much in advance.
Roy
Royabramson@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there!<br />
There is a service called &#8220;photography blogsites&#8221;-  have you heard of it? since I don&#8217;t know much about CSS HTML etc, I also have a Smugmug pro acount and have the same desire-to find a way to make everything homogeous &#8211; it isn&#8217;t cheap but it battles all that you have discussed. I don&#8217;t know much about wordpress but I am not so happy with the blogsites themes-Do you have a word of advice for me? Thank you Very much in advance.<br />
Roy<br />
<a href="mailto:Royabramson@gmail.com">Royabramson@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrating WordPress.org and Smugmug by Michael Hampson</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2011/01/integrating-wordpress-org-and-smugmug/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelhampson.com/?p=341#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Great, I&#039;m glad it helped -- if you haven&#039;t seen it already, I describe another trick you might find useful &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2011/01/smugmug-wordpress-css-selectivity/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Basically, if you don&#039;t want to use !important (which can have unintended consequences), you can also use pseudoclasses to give your styles higher priority. 

I use a lot the pseudoclass :not(#none) quite a bit -- as long as you&#039;re not trying it on something with the #none ID, it&#039;s a totally harmless way to get an element&#039;s selectivity higher than Smugmug&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, I&#8217;m glad it helped &#8212; if you haven&#8217;t seen it already, I describe another trick you might find useful <a href="http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2011/01/smugmug-wordpress-css-selectivity/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Basically, if you don&#8217;t want to use !important (which can have unintended consequences), you can also use pseudoclasses to give your styles higher priority. </p>
<p>I use a lot the pseudoclass :not(#none) quite a bit &#8212; as long as you&#8217;re not trying it on something with the #none ID, it&#8217;s a totally harmless way to get an element&#8217;s selectivity higher than Smugmug&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Integrating WordPress.org and Smugmug by foksieloy fxly</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2011/01/integrating-wordpress-org-and-smugmug/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>foksieloy fxly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.michaelhampson.com/?p=341#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for this, I was doing battle with the damn smugmug site for a day now, completely forgot about !important.

You are a life saver. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for this, I was doing battle with the damn smugmug site for a day now, completely forgot about !important.</p>
<p>You are a life saver. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Domke F-802 Review by Brett Simison</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2010/06/domke-f-802-review/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Simison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mhphoto.nfshost.com/?p=32#comment-155</guid>
		<description>I disagree -- the protection offered by Domke bags isn&#039;t questionable at all. I&#039;ve been using an F-2 and an F-4AF professionally for years and have never had a problem where they&#039;ve allowed my gear to be damaged. In fact, I find that the body-hugging ability of the Domkes allows me to maintain a lower physical profile in tight shooting environments, therefore encountering fewer dings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree &#8212; the protection offered by Domke bags isn&#8217;t questionable at all. I&#8217;ve been using an F-2 and an F-4AF professionally for years and have never had a problem where they&#8217;ve allowed my gear to be damaged. In fact, I find that the body-hugging ability of the Domkes allows me to maintain a lower physical profile in tight shooting environments, therefore encountering fewer dings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Domke F-6 Ruggedwear review by CoigreeClit</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2009/12/domke-f-6-ruggedwear-review/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>CoigreeClit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mhphoto.nfshost.com/?p=53#comment-153</guid>
		<description>I loved your blog. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved your blog. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Basic Product Photography Lighting, Part 2 by Our Garden Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Illuminating Up Your Interior with Mini Pendants</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2010/11/product-photo-lighting-2/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Garden Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Illuminating Up Your Interior with Mini Pendants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mhphoto.nfshost.com/?p=7#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Hampson Photography &#187; Basic Product Photography Lighting, Part 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Hampson Photography &raquo; Basic Product Photography Lighting, Part 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Helios-44-2 by Davide Tambuchi</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2009/05/helios-44-2/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Davide Tambuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mhphoto.nfshost.com/?p=90#comment-12</guid>
		<description>great lens!!! Great with film!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great lens!!! Great with film!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Domke F-6 Ruggedwear review by Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.michaelhampson.com/2009/12/domke-f-6-ruggedwear-review/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mhphoto.nfshost.com/?p=53#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Yeah, if the F-6 ever gets too small to be my work bag for outdoor/nature shooting, I&#039;ll definitely be getting an F-2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, if the F-6 ever gets too small to be my work bag for outdoor/nature shooting, I&#039;ll definitely be getting an F-2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

